Different embedding models map inputs to incompatible vector spaces, forcing costly re-embedding when models are switched or combined. We present Relative Anchor Translation (RAT), a zero-shot protocol that translates between embedding spaces by comparing similarity profiles to shared anchor points, requiring no training data or learned parameters. Evaluating RAT on 13 models from 9 families—including a decoder-based LLM (GTE-Qwen2-1.5B)—we find that similarity compression is the dominant predictor of RAT accuracy within representationally compatible families (ρ = −0.62). A second, independent factor determines whether translation is possible at all: representational compatibility, measured by RDM correlation. BERT-family encoders and newer decoder-based models share zero RDM correlation (ρ ≈ 0), creating a hard boundary that no current method—RAT, Ridge, or Procrustes—can cross. Within compatible families, RAT achieves Recall@1 from 13% to 99% across 110 directed pairs. A comparison with Procrustes, Ridge, and Affine alignment across 132 pairs reveals complementary strengths: RAT dominates with ≤50 anchor pairs (74% win rate), linear methods dominate with ≥200 (90%). Three application scenarios demonstrate practical value: same-family model upgrades retain 94% retrieval accuracy at 0.05% of re-indexing cost; lightweight query gateways achieve 98% accuracy with 6× speedup; and multi-database unified search reaches Recall@5 = 96%. Code and data: https://github.com/jiro-prog/rat-experiment Implementation was conducted using Claude Code (Anthropic). Experimental design, analysis, and manuscript drafting were assisted by Claude (Anthropic). The author takes full responsibility for all content.
Sojiro Uemoto (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: