Measurement Without Reductionism introduces a non-reductive framework for operationalising coherence in human systems across personal, relational, organisational, and societal scales. Rather than treating coherence as a single measurable variable, the paper proposes a multi-register, phase-sensitive, and scale-aware approach that integrates first-person (phenomenological), second-person (relational), and third-person (physiological and behavioural) forms of observation. The framework distinguishes clearly between indicators, proxies, interpretations, and claims, reducing common errors such as reductionism, over-interpretation, and moralisation. It emphasises triangulation, temporal patterning, and context-sensitive interpretation rather than static or single-variable measurement. Drawing on dynamical systems theory, allostatic load, predictive processing, process-based therapy, and field-based psychology, the paper provides a practical methodology for assessing coherence without collapsing human complexity into narrow metrics. The paper forms part of an ongoing research programme in field-based psychology, following: Field-Based Psychology: Registers of Inquiry in Consciousness Studies Psycho-Thermodynamics: A Functional Model of Load, Rhythm, and Coherence in Human Systems The Coherence Cycle: A Cross-Scale Process Model of Stabilisation, Destabilisation, and Reorganisation in Human Systems Together, these works aim to establish a coherent, non-reductive framework for understanding human systems across domains.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carl Langley
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carl Langley (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d49f6bb33cc4c35a227e8e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19427590
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: