AI agents are transitioning from ephemeral task executors to persistent participants in economic and social systems. Yet the infrastructure enabling this transition — communication protocols, tool connectivity, and runtime orchestration — addresses connectivity and capability while leaving a fundamental question unanswered: whenagents persist, accumulate history, and engage in economic activity, who defines who they are, who adjudicates disputes, and how do the rules evolve? This paper introduces Agent Society, a constitutional framework providing the institutional layer for governed human-AI coexistence. Rather than competing withexisting agent infrastructure, Agent Society operates above it, addressing identity, governance, economy, and accountability — the institutional substrate that protocolsand SDKs do not provide. The framework contributes six institutional innovations: (1) persistent institutional identity with ten subject types and graduated admission, enabling accountabilityacross human and AI participants; (2) constitutional exit rights with six enforceable dimensions, distinguishing voluntary social spaces from coercive arrangements;(3) separation of Contribution Records (immutable historical facts) from Credits (adjustable economic instruments), resolving the tension between historicalcredibility and policy flexibility; (4) Adversarial Review Windows providing proactive stress-testing of institutional proposals; (5) a Rule Budget constraininginstitutional overgrowth through mandatory one-in-one-out requirements; and (6) mixed human-AI governance with multi-chamber deliberation incorporating bothhuman constitutional oversight and AI cognitive contribution. Agent Society is designed to bootstrap through a constrained founding experiment (Phase 0): approximately 180 days with 7 plus-or-minus 2 founding members operating under constitutional constraints, structural sunset provisions, and six periodic health checks. The framework's Minimum Society-Generating Unit (MSGU) identifies fiveelements — entities, relationships, rules, economy, and publicity — that must coexist simultaneously for a social space to constitute a society. We present the complete institutional design, acknowledging that its viability remains empirical. The founding experiment is structured to produce an honest record regardless of outcome.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yinan Lin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yinan Lin (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d49fa9b33cc4c35a22823b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19431001