Contemporary theories of consciousness share an unexamined foundational commitment: that subjective experience constitutes a unified, continuous stream anchored to a singular self-model. This paper argues that this commitment is not an empirical finding but a methodological artefact produced by measuring consciousness under conditions that hold neural pathway dominance artificially constant. When context shifts radically, conscious experience does not degrade gradually — it ruptures, revealing that phenomenological identity is constituted by whichever neural pathway configuration is currently dominant. Pathway-Dominant Consciousness Theory (PDC Theory) advances three core propositions: the Pathway Dominance Principle, holding that consciousness at any moment is the phenomenological output of the currently dominant pathway; the Phenomenological Fidelity Principle, holding that complete reinstatement of a prior pathway reproduces its full phenomenological state including temporal reference point; and the Repertoire Expansion Corollary, reconceptualising psychological development as accumulation of distinct switchable configurations. Central to the framework is a Three-Tier Model distinguishing ordinary recall, state-dependent enhancement, and full pathway reinstatement — the last constituting temporal self-displacement, categorically differentiated from mental time travel by the constitutive absence of meta-awareness. Drawing on network neuroscience, memory engram research, predictive processing, trauma, and philosophy of mind, PDC Theory provides a unified mechanistic account of six phenomena including PTSD flashbacks, dementia temporal displacement, and Dissociative Identity Disorder. Explicit falsifiability commitments and philosophical implications are developed.
Zaelani (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: