Abstract Introduction Although obesity is typically associated with adverse health outcomes, emerging evidence suggests paradoxical protective effects against mortality in burn and critically ill patients. However, most prior investigations were limited by small sample sizes. This study utilized a large, multicenter database to evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) and sepsis after severe burn injury. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed using the TriNetX database. Adult burn patients (18 years) were stratified by standardized BMI categories: Normal (20–24.9), Overweight (25–29.9), Obesity Class I (30–34.9), Obesity Class II (35–39.9), and Obesity Class III (≥40). Four matched cohorts were generated: Normal versus Overweight (5426 vs. 4610 pts), Normal versus Obesity Class I (5,426 vs. 5620 pts), Normal versus Obesity Class II (5426 vs. 3210 pts), and Normal versus Obesity Class III (5426 vs. 7163 pts). Cohorts were balanced for age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Outcomes of AKI and sepsis were assessed beginning one day post-injury. Results Normal BMI patients had higher rates of sepsis and AKI compared with Overweight (sepsis: 9.95% vs. 6.03%, AKI: 7.28% vs. 4.39%, both p.0001), Obesity Class I (sepsis: 9.70% vs. 5.50%, p=.0001; AKI: 6.72% vs. 4.74%, p=.0002), and Obesity Class II patients (sepsis: 10.13% vs. 4.00%, p.0001; AKI: 6.62% vs. 4.59%, p=.0013). In contrast, Obesity Class III patients demonstrated higher complication risk, particularly AKI (sepsis: 10.82% vs. 9.77%, p=.1102; AKI: 15.29% vs. 11.98%, p=.0001). Conclusions BMI significantly influences outcomes after burn injury. Overweight, Obesity Class I, and Obesity Class II patients exhibited a reduced risk of AKI and sepsis compared with normal BMI patients, supporting a potential obesity paradox. In contrast, Obesity Class III patients faced increased risk, particularly for renal complications. Applicability of Research to Practice Incorporating BMI into burn care protocols may improve outcomes. Class III patients warrant early renal-protective strategies and tailored dosing, while normal BMI patients may benefit from enhanced nutritional support. Burn systems should integrate BMI into triage, resuscitation targets, and monitoring to optimize resource allocation. Funding for the study This research was supported by an endowed fund for burn research and education, as well as by the Institute for Translational Sciences, supported in part by a Clinical and Translational Science Award from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content of this study is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mbinui Ghogomu
Yves Balikosa
Ann Obi
Journal of Burn Care & Research
University of Virginia
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ghogomu et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895796c1944d70ce067b1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag033.305