This paper establishes that the empirical–topological admissibility conditions (Conditions 4–7) used in the Persistence Admissibility Theorem (PAT) are not auxiliary assumptions but necessary conditions for the very existence of a global persistence law. While Conditions 1–3 make the persistence problem meaningful, Conditions 4–7 are shown to be required for its formulation as a single global, empirically testable constraint. It follows that any theory claiming a global law of persistence already presupposes these conditions. Combined with PAT, this yields: any global persistence law is structurally equivalent to R ≤ F·M·K.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marc Maibom
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marc Maibom (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8968f6c1944d70ce08173 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19471677