Philosophical accounts of reasons typically treat them either as independent normative entities that guide action or as instruments for organising pre-existing desires. This paper rejects both approaches. It argues that reasons are neither external to motivation nor reducible to it, but are transformations of motivational structure mediated by representation. To recognise a reason is not to introduce a new force into deliberation, but to reorganise existing motivational influences through a change in how they are represented. On this account, reasoning is not the application of external standards to desire, but the restructuring of the motivational system itself. This reframing dissolves the traditional opposition between reason and desire and situates reasons within a broader structural account of agency as an act of integration.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joe Alexander Creed
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joe Alexander Creed (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc88583afacbeac03ea3c5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19512250