Abstract The Goods and Services Tax (GST) represents one of the most significant tax reforms in India’s economic history. Introduced on July 1 2017, GST has replaced all multiple indirect taxes imposed by the central and state governments with a new taxation system. The reform aimed to simplify the tax structure, enhance transparency, and create a common national market. Over time, GST has contributed significantly to improving tax compliance and expanding the tax base in India. Recent data indicates that gross GST collections reached a record of ₹22.08 lakh crore in the financial year 2024–25, with an average monthly collection of about ₹1.84 lakh crore, reflecting improved compliance and economic growth. The implementation of GST has faced several operational and organizational challenges affecting businesses and government institutions. The complex tax slabs, technological challenges in the GST Network (GSTN), compliance burdens are issued and difficulties in input tax credit reconciliation continue to affect the effectiveness of the system. Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) have been particularly affected due to limited technical expertise and financial resources. The objective of this paper is to analyse the organizational and operational challenges of GST implementation in India through secondary data from government publications, academic journals, and policy reports. The paper also explores sectoral impacts and offers policy recommendations consistent with India's vision for long-term development, Viksit Bharat 2047. The research indicates that streamlining the GST framework, bolstering digital infrastructure, and enhancing administrative coordination can improve the effectiveness of the GST system and contribute to sustainable economic growth. Keywords: GST, indirect taxation, tax reform, compliance challenges, Viksit Bharat 1.Introduction The economic progress of our country depends upon how its finances are handled both heavily rely on taxation. An effective tax system can help mobilize resources, finance infrastructure development, and ensure economic stability. Before the GST rollout, the Indian tax landscape was a complicated mix of duties, including VAT and service tax, which resulted in a cascading effect of taxes, cumbersome administration, and difficulties for businesses to comply. To overcome these challenges, the Government of India implemented the Goods and Services Tax (GST) reform on 1 July 2017. GST's implementation effectively eliminated more than 17 indirect taxes along with 13 cesses, which had been imposed by both the central and state governments, thus creating a standardized tax system across India. With GST, the emphasis is on taxing consumption, meaning the revenue goes to the place where the goods or services are purchased, not where they originated. By adopting this system, the aim was to create a more straightforward tax system, make things clearer, and implement the "One Nation, One Tax" concept. Since its implementation, GST has significantly expanded the taxpayer base. The number of registered taxpayers increased from about 65 lakh in 2017 to more than 1.51 crore by 2025, demonstrating the widening scope of tax compliance. However, the transition to GST has not been without difficulties. Businesses have faced operational challenges such as technological issues with the GST portal, frequent regulatory changes, and complex compliance procedures. At the same time, administrative challenges related to coordination between the central and state governments have affected the efficiency of the system. Understanding these challenges is important for improving the GST framework and aligning it with India’s long-term development strategy, particularly the Viksit Bharat 2047 vision, which aims to transform India into a developed economy. Conceptual Model The conceptual model illustrates the relationship between GST implementation factors and their impact on economic outcomes. The GST policy framework, digital infrastructure, and compliance requirements act as independent variables influencing the system. These factors generate operational and organizational challenges, which act as mediating variables affecting business performance. 2.Objectives of the Study The main objectives of the study are: To examine the operational challenges faced by businesses in implementing GST in India. To analyse organizational and administrative challenges in GST governance. To assess the sectoral impact of GST implementation on businesses. To suggest policy recommendations aligned with the vision of Viksit Bharat. 3.Review of Literature 1. Goyal (2024) examined the compliance challenges faced by MSMEs under GST in India. The study highlighted that small businesses experience significant difficulties due to complex filing procedures and lack of technical knowledge. It emphasized that GST increased compliance burden despite improving transparency. The research also found that awareness levels among MSMEs remain low. The study suggested simplification of GST procedures. It concluded that policy support is necessary to improve MSME participation in the GST framework. 2. Buttan et al. (2024) analysed GST compliance challenges in the pharmaceutical sector. The study revealed that documentation complexity and input tax credit issues significantly affect business operations. It also found that frequent regulatory changes create uncertainty. The research emphasized higher compliance costs for SMEs. The study suggested better digital infrastructure and support systems. It concluded that sector-specific reforms are essential for effective GST implementation. 3. Shacheendran (2024) studied the barriers faced by businesses under GST implementation. The research identified tax complexity and frequent policy changes as major challenges. It highlighted that businesses struggle to adapt to evolving GST regulations. The study also emphasized administrative inefficiencies. It suggested improving policy consistency and simplification. The study concluded that reducing complexity can enhance compliance efficiency. 4. Soni (2025) examined the impact of digitalization on GST compliance in India. The study found that digital systems improved transparency and efficiency in tax filing. However, it identified technical issues such as portal downtime and system errors. The research highlighted the importance of strong IT infrastructure. It suggested upgrading GSTN systems for better performance. The study concluded that digital strengthening is crucial for improving compliance. 5. Kumar and Sharma (2023) analysed the impact of GST on small businesses in India. The study found that SMEs face increased compliance costs and operational challenges. It highlighted financial constraints as a major barrier. The research emphasized the need for government support mechanisms. It suggested training and financial assistance programs. The study concluded that SMEs require policy support to adapt effectively to GST. 6. Singh (2022) studied the impact of GST on tax efficiency in India. The study found that GST significantly improved revenue collection and reduced tax evasion. It highlighted increased transparency in the tax system. The research emphasized the positive role of GST in economic integration. It suggested further reforms for efficiency enhancement. The study concluded that GST contributes positively to economic growth. 7. Reddy & Kumar (2023) analysed the impact of GST on supply chain efficiency in India. The study found improvements in logistics and interstate trade. However, it highlighted ongoing compliance challenges for businesses. The research emphasized administrative burdens. It suggested simplification of GST procedures. The study concluded that GST improves supply chain efficiency but requires further refinement. 8. Patel (2022) examined the impact of GST on consumer pricing in India. The study found mixed effects on prices across different sectors. It highlighted that multiple tax slabs influence pricing patterns. The research emphasized the need for tax rationalization. It suggested reducing complexity in tax rates. The study concluded that pricing stability depends on GST simplification. 9. Verma (2023) studied GST awareness among small businesses in India. The research found low awareness levels and knowledge gaps among business owners. It highlighted the need for training and education programs. The study emphasized the role of government initiatives. It suggested awareness campaigns for better compliance. The study concluded that improved knowledge enhances GST adoption. 10. Gupta & Mehta (2024) analysed administrative challenges in GST implementation. The study found coordination gaps between central and state governments. It highlighted governance inefficiencies affecting implementation. The research emphasized the need for policy alignment. It suggested improving administrative coordination. The study concluded that effective governance is essential for GST success. 4.Research Gap Although the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) has been widely studied in India, ranging from compliance challenges and digital issues to its impact on pricing, supply chains, and tax efficiency. Researchers like Goyal (2024), Buttan et al. (2024), and Shacheendran (2024) have consistently pointed out that businesses, especially MSMEs, face difficulties due to complex procedures, frequent regulatory changes, and lack of awareness. At the same time, studies such as Singh (2022) and Reddy & Kumar (2023) highlight the broader benefits of GST, including improved transparency and supply chain efficiency. First, most studies focus on specific sectors (like pharmaceuticals) or specific issues (such as compliance or digitalization), but there is a lack of a comprehensive, integrated analysis that brings together compliance challenges, digital infrastructure, awareness lev
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pooja Sethia
Dr. Dinesh. N
Manzoor Ali Khan
Jain University
CMR University
Tonbridge School
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sethia et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc89473afacbeac03eb234 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19512451
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: