Catheter ablation in ICD-naive ventricular tachycardia patients was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality (3.17% vs. 8.98%; P<.001) compared to management without ablation.
Cohort (n=2,214,424)
Yes
Does catheter ablation reduce in-hospital mortality in ICD-naive patients hospitalized with ventricular tachycardia?
2,214,424 adult hospitalizations with ventricular tachycardia (VT) without prior implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) or ICD implantation during the same admission (ICD-naive), from the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021).
Catheter ablation
Managed without catheter ablation
In-hospital mortalityhard clinical
In ICD-naive patients hospitalized with ventricular tachycardia, catheter ablation is associated with improved in-hospital survival but carries higher procedural risks such as tamponade and cardiogenic shock.
Absolute Event Rate: 3.17% vs 8.98%
p-value: p=<.001
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a fatal arrhythmia, often managed with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Many patients, however, present without an ICD. The role of catheter ablation in this high-risk group is unclear, particularly for short-term in-hospital outcomes. We assessed associations between ablation and in-hospital outcomes among ICD-naive VT patients using a large national dataset. We conducted a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021), identifying adult hospitalizations with VT. Patients with prior ICDs or ICD implantation during the same admission were excluded. The cohort was divided into those who underwent catheter ablation versus those managed without ablation. Multivariable logistic regression and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) adjusted for demographic, clinical, and hospital factors. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), sepsis, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (death, STEMI, or cardiogenic shock), cardiogenic shock, tamponade, mechanical circulatory support (MCS), acute heart failure, and prolonged hospitalization (≥7 days). Of 2,214,424 VT hospitalizations, 32,640 (1.5%) underwent catheter ablation. After PSM (n = 12,668), ablation was associated with significantly lower rates of in-hospital mortality (3.17% vs. 8.98%; P P P P P P P < .001). Rates of acute heart failure and prolonged hospitalization were comparable. In ICD-naive VT patients, catheter ablation was associated with improved in-hospital survival and fewer complications, albeit with higher procedural risks.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ali Saad Al-Shammari
University of Baghdad
Ankur Singla
Trinity Health
A M E E R Awashra
An-Najah National University
University of California, Davis
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Al-Shammari et al. (Sun,) conducted a cohort in Ventricular tachycardia (n=2,214,424). Catheter ablation vs. Managed without ablation was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=<.001). Catheter ablation in ICD-naive ventricular tachycardia patients was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality (3.17% vs. 8.98%; P<.001) compared to management without ablation.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2a4be4eeef8a2a6af8c5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2026.17033