We present two new unconditional results for the weighted graph Laplacian LN of the first N Riemann zeros, introduced in Wright (2026a–e), and use them to close the research program with a precise account of what has been established and what remains open. First (Theorem 2.2), we prove the unconditional identity TrHad(N) = Pfull(N) + 2N¯ BN , where Pfull is a prime sum over the full complex zero positions ρj , without assuming the Riemann Hypothesis (RH). Second (Corollary 3.6), we prove matching bounds on the spectral gap: the lower bound λ2(LN ) ≥ π2/(N2 δ2 j ) follows from Selberg’s zero-gap theorem and a path-graph comparison, and the upper bound λ2(LN ) ≤ 12 j<k (j−k)2/(γj−γk )2/N(N2 −1) is new and follows from the linear test vector vj= j−(N+1)/2. Both bounds are exact in terms of actual zero spacings; using Ingham’s unconditional max-gap bound and the Selberg gap respectively, they give explicit forms C1(log TN )2/N41/12 ≤λ2(LN ) ≤C2(log TN )2/N unconditionally. The upper bound is numerically tight to within a factor of 1.7–2.0 for N ≤50. We close with a complete program summary: the structural reason the framework cannot by itself prove RH, the connection to the Baluyot–Goldston–Suriajaya–Turnage-Butterbaugh unconditional pair correlation program, and a precise statement of what new external mathematics would be required to close the gap.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Devin Wright
Occidental College
Occidental Petroleum (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Devin Wright (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddda4de195c95cdefd7b79 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19521038
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: