This article develops a theory of the market as a collective regulatory field in which relations to uncertainty, intensity, value, and cohesion are transmitted, synchronized, and stabilized. Drawing on the Narcissistic Spectrum of Positions, narcissism is conceptualized as a primary regulatory function, and the spectrum as a dynamic continuum through which subjects, relationships, networks, and institutions organize their capacity to process intensity and tolerate uncertainty. Within this framework, the market is approached as an emergent field of psychosomatic regulation. The central argument is that crisis begins in success, when sustained ascent, compressed volatility, increased leverage, and growing uniformity of expectations transform success from an outcome into a mechanism for producing certainty. Under such conditions, risk may remain known at the level of information while ceasing to function as a regulator of thought and action. Projective identification is elaborated as a process through which states are transmitted prior to their organization into narrative, allowing synchronized reactions to precede shared interpretation. The Babel phenomenon describes a condition in which communication intensifies while shared symbolization collapses. The model is applied to the 2008 financial crisis and to the cases of Terra/Luna and FTX, showing that crisis involves not only declining valuations but also a breakdown in the field’s capacity to sustain coherence, generate shared meaning, and metabolize uncertainty. The article offers a diagnostic and interpretive framework for identifying regime shifts in the collective field before they are fully captured by conventional indicators.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dimitris Seferiadis
Psychoanalytical Association
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dimitris Seferiadis (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c01e4eeef8a2a6b106e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19560520
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: