Abstract In discussions of climate and sustainability transitions, justice has come to play a prominent role—specifically, justice in how a transition treats the people affected by it. This Perspective article asks how justice claims in such transitions can be more clearly distinguished and integrated. It introduces two distinctions: a temporal distinction between transitional distribution and post-transition distribution, and a scope distinction between transition-bound and structural-scope approaches. The article also discusses the procedural justice questions of how and by whom substantive transition decisions should be made.
Zan et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: