Contemporary philosophical ontology remains predominantly structured around static categories such as objects, properties, and relations, even when addressing inherently dynamic domains such as cognition, artificial intelligence, and complex adaptive systems. While change is widely acknowledged, it is typically treated as derivative rather than constitutive of the entities undergoing it. This paper argues that this reflects a structural limitation within current philosophical frameworks: dynamics is not recognized as a fundamental ontological dimension, but is instead presupposed or reduced to transformations of already given structures. In response, a trialist framework is proposed in which reality is understood through three irreducible and interdependent dimensions: structure, order, and dynamics. These are not substances or independent domains, but complementary modes under which entities can be determined and described. The present paper introduces this framework in its minimal form, providing a conceptual foundation for subsequent analyses of transformation, emergence, and dynamically constituted systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dirk Gamboa Tautkus
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dirk Gamboa Tautkus (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07e3b2f7e8953b7cbf32b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19581366