ABSTRACT Neurological and psychiatric disorders, arising from disruptions in neural circuitry, pose a major and growing challenge to global healthcare systems. Brain–computer interface (BCI) technology has emerged as a promising approach, enabling direct communication between the brain and external devices. By facilitating bidirectional interaction with the nervous system, BCIs open new avenues for both diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we examine recent advances in recording and stimulation technologies within the BCI framework and evaluate their therapeutic potential across major neuropsychiatric disorders. We focus particularly on post‐stroke motor rehabilitation as a representative paradigm, providing detailed analysis of the mechanisms, clinical evidence, and future prospects of endovascular BCI, BCI‐integrated epidural spinal cord stimulation, and BCI‐driven deep brain stimulation. We further extend the discussion to movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease and epilepsy, as well as cognitive and psychiatric conditions including Alzheimer's disease and depression, highlighting how BCI‐based approaches enable symptom detection and closed‐loop neuromodulation. Additionally, we address ethical and societal considerations accompanying clinical translation of these advanced neurotechnologies. By integrating current evidence, this review highlights a paradigm shift toward more active, precise, and personalized neural rehabilitation enabled by BCI systems, while outlining key challenges and future directions for research and clinical application.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yeguang Xu
Tongji Hospital
D Chen
Tongji Hospital
Qing Ye
Tongji Hospital
MedComm
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Tongji Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07e992f7e8953b7cbf754 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.70739
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: