Anatomic versus physiologic repair in congenitally corrected transposition: a propensity-matched european multicentre study

Key Points

• To compare long-term survival and reoperation rates between anatomic and physiologic repair techniques for ccTGA.
• European multicentre study design
• Propensity matching to compare similar patients
• Assessment of tricuspid valve function post-repair
• Long-term survival rates are similar for both repair types
• Reoperation rates are comparable
• Physiologic repair may lead to deteriorating tricuspid valve function
• Anatomic repair improves function for patients with tricuspid regurgitation

Structured PICO

Abstract