Abstract Objective: To determine activity of the combination of niraparib and dostarlimab, following a 4-week niraparib priming lead-in in patients with documented somatic or germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 breast (BC), ovary (OC) and pancreas (PC) cancer and identify translational determinants of improved response. Methods: Planned enrollment was 18 patients. Patients could have received prior PARP inhibitor (PARPi) or prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor, but not both. Patients underwent a biopsy before treatment and again after 4 weeks of niraparib-alone (200mg or 300 mg daily) treatment. They then received a combination of niraparib 200 mg po daily and dostarlimab 500 mg iv q 3 weeks x 4, then 1000 mg q 6 weeks until disease progression. Primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and rate of durable (≥18 months) response. Secondary outcomes included safety and tolerability of the combined treatment and the ORR in patients whose disease had progressed on prior PARPi. Planned translational studies include 2-D and 3-D mapping of the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) before and after niraparib therapy. Results: 18 patients were enrolled: 7 BC (3 BRCA1, 4 BRCA2), 6 OC (4 BRCA1, 2 BRCA2), and 5 PC (4 BRCA2, 1 BRCA1) ; 2 with somatic and 16 with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Racial distribution was 1 (5. 6%) AIAN, 3 (16. 7%) Asian, 1 Black (5. 6%), 13 (72. 2%) White. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 1-10). 9 (50%) patients had prior PARPi and none had prior PD-1 inhibitor. 17 patients were evaluable for toxicity and 15 for response. In the 15 patients assessable for response, the best ORR was partial response (PR) in 4 (26. 7%), stable disease (SD) in 5 (33. 3%), and progressive disease (PD) in 6 (40%). 2 (33%) of 6 evaluable BC had PR and 2 (33%) of 6 OC had PR, and 0 of 3 PC had an objective response. DOR ranged from 5. 6 to 11. 0 months with no durable (≥18 months) response. Of 2 patients with OC and prior PARPi exposure without progression, both had PR with PFS of 11 and 13 months In contrast, 5 (4OC, 1 BC) evaluable patients with prior PARPi progression, 1 (20%) had SD, and 4 (80%) had PD. Median PFS was 2. 4 mos (95% CI 2. 0-7. 7 mos) and median OS was 11. 0 mos (95% CI 5. 8-27. 7 mos). 9 of 17 (52. 9%) patients had one or more grade 3 or 4 toxicity, which included grade 3 hypertension (n=4), grade 3 neutropenia, (n=2), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (N=2), and grade 4 transaminitis (n=1). No patients came off trial for toxicity. Conclusion: A niraparib lead-in followed by combined niraparib and dostarlimab therapy demonstrated moderate clinical activity, achieving an objective response rate (ORR) of 33% in patients with recurrent BRCA1/2-mutated breast and ovarian cancers, while showing minimal activity in pancreatic cancer and in tumors with prior progression on PARPi. Translational correlatives are in progress for paired pre- and on-treatment biopsies. No unexpected toxicities were identified for the combination. Citation Format: Elizabeth M. Swisher, Andrew Coveler, Kalyan Banda, Lynn Symonds, Isabel Rodriguez, Hannah H. Lee, Reina Hibbert, Jeniece Hensel, Harini Ramachandran, Tiffany N. Jones, Kelsey Baker, Mary Redman, Jennifer Specht. A phase 1B investigator-initiated trial of niraparib lead-in, followed by niraparib plus dostarlimab for metastatic BRCA1/2-mutated breast, tubo-ovarian, and pancreatic cancers abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts) ; 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86 (8Suppl): Abstract nr CT044.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Elizabeth M. Swisher
Andrew Coveler
Kalyan Banda
Cancer Research
University of Washington
Fred Hutch Cancer Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Swisher et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e473de010ef96374d8f936 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-ct044
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: