The scientific investigation into the architecture of human affect has historically been defined by a fundamental theoretical schism, often characterized as a "100-year war" between discrete emotion models and dimensional frameworks. Discrete models, such as those proposed by Izard and Ekman, argue for biologically hardwired, universal emotional categories like fear, anger, and joy, presumed to have evolved as distinct adaptive responses to environmental challenges. Conversely, dimensional models prioritize a continuous spectrum of valence and arousal, suggesting that what individuals categorize as emotions are essentially cognitive constructions layered atop simpler physiological states. The Core Emotion Framework (CEF) emerges as a sophisticated structural-constructivist resolution to this dichotomy, proposing a modular system that accounts for the complexity of human experience while maintaining a rigorous, repeatable structural foundation rooted in ten universal emotional operators or powers. Within the CEF, emotions are not viewed as static states or feelings but as functional operators within a complex human operating system. This paradigm shift suggests that emotional states are predictable computational events rather than subjective mysteries. The CEF operationalizes these processes by decomposing all affective phenomena into a small, non-overlapping set of ten operators, which serve as the emotional equivalent of CPU instructions. These operators determine what information is permitted to enter the system, what is filtered out, what actions become available, and how the system predicts the next state. The structural integrity of this system is maintained through the dynamic balance of these ten operators, organized across three functional centers: the Head, the Heart, and the Gut. The central inquiry of this report concerns the specific mechanical and psychological consequences of the state traditionally known as mania, or "manya" in specific clinical adaptations, and whether this state can be managed through a "counting" protocol involving the scalar modulation of the Sensing operator and the reinforcement of operators within the Balancing and Reflecting axes. Silencing, defined as the modulation of an operator to zero intensity or its complete removal from the functional loop, triggers predictable structural failures within the architecture of resource allocation, behavior prioritization, and state transitions. When the emotional architecture becomes locked or when an operator is pushed offline, the resulting distortion leads to phenomena such as identity collapse, chronic anxiety patterns, and the bipolar fluctuations seen in manic and depressive cycles. Keywords: Core Emotion Framework (CEF), emotional operators, operator silencing, structural psychopathology, bipolar disorder, mania (manya), counting protocol, Outgoing–Reflecting–Balancing axis, operator modulation, identity collapse cycle, embodied cognition, somatic anchoring, state transition function (TS-1), parallel and sequential composition, digital biomarkers, semantic agency.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chénglán Xǔ
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chénglán Xǔ (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e473de010ef96374d8f958 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19618933
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: