Background: Evaluation of chromosome aneuploidy and gene-level copy number alterations for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making in solid tumors is the standard of care. Chromosomal microarray (CMA), next-generation sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are the gold standard for detecting these variants in tumor tissue. In contrast to most solid tumors, cancers of the central nervous system (CNS) pose a unique challenge for effective detection via plasma due to the blood–brain barrier (BBB), with the additional challenges of brain biopsy or surgery being highly invasive and posing a significant risk to the patient. The Belay Ascent™ liquid biopsy test uses low-pass whole-genome sequencing (LP-WGS) to report on chromosome arm-level aneuploidy and gene-level copy number variants (CNVs) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to inform diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making in CNS tumors. Methods: This study presents the equivalence of Ascent™ in detecting chromosome arm-level aneuploidy and gene-level CNVs using 48 tissue specimens followed by a clinical validation using a cohort of 32 CSF specimens with matched tissue-based tumor profiling information. Results: Equivalence of Ascent™ in detecting chromosome arm-level aneuploidy and gene-level CNVs using 48 tissue specimens was shown to have 100% and 97% positive percent agreement (PPA), respectively, compared to the gold standard of CMA/NGS. The validation cohort of 32 CSF specimens demonstrated 78% and 90% PPA for aneuploidy and gene-level CNVs, respectively. Clinical impact of Ascent™ was demonstrated, with 243 production cases able to inform the diagnosis and management of CNS tumors with high accuracy. Conclusions: Given the paucity of cells in CSF, limiting the use of karyotyping, CMA, IHC, and FISH, the Belay Ascent™ test provides a highly sensitive novel minimally invasive method for the evaluation of chromosome aneuploidy and gene-level CNVs in CSF.
Nie et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: