Abstract The Amazon is rapidly approaching an ecological tipping point driven by deforestation, forest degradation and global climate change. These are visible issues that receive increasing political and public attention. However, the accelerating biocultural loss in the Amazon, including the extinction of Indigenous languages, the disruption of Indigenous and local knowledge systems, and the disintegration of culturally embedded livelihoods, remains largely invisible and hardly receives much attention. These losses are compounded by the organized crime and illicit economies that displace communities, alongside the imposition of external conservation and development models on Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. We argue that science and policy must move away from reductionist, quantifiable carbon and biodiversity‐centred frameworks, to instead recognize and engage with the plurality of Indigenous and local knowledge systems that generate locally relevant and just solutions that safeguard the Amazon's ecological integrity and the well‐being of people living in the region. By linking biodiversity conservation with territorial rights, socioeconomic equity and climate justice, we highlight that the Amazon needs to be understood as a living pluriverse, a place home to multiple worldviews, languages, laws, ontologies, knowledges and management systems where social and ecological vitality are inseparable and interconnected. Meaningful climate and biodiversity outcomes for the Amazon depend on policies that prioritize its biocultural integrity, strengthen territorial rights and local self‐governance, and dismantle the systemic drivers that fuel its social‐ecological collapse. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Torsten Krause
Mairon G. Bastos Lima
Jesica López
People and Nature
The University of Texas at Austin
Lund University
Stockholm Environment Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Krause et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e5c3a703c293991402979a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70322