Pulse Explore Journal Club Debates Trending Researchers Journals

Home Explore Journal Club Trending

⌘+K

Withdrawal, Consent, and the Limits of ICC Jurisdiction: The Duterte Case | Synapse

April 21, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Withdrawal, Consent, and the Limits of ICC Jurisdiction: The Duterte Case

View Full Paper

MMMorris Kiwinda Mbondenyi

Key Points

The aim is to examine the complexities of ICC jurisdiction concerning withdrawal and consent, specifically in the Duterte case.
Analysis of treaty design
Comparison of institutional legitimacy
Evaluation of criminal responsibility versus adjudicative jurisdiction
Identified limitations in ICC jurisdiction linked to states' withdrawal
Highlighted the significance of consent in treaty obligations
Clarified the distinction between types of jurisdiction in international law

Abstract

A Policy Brief on Treaty Design, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Distinction Between Criminal Responsibility and Adjudicative Jurisdiction

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

Share

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morris Kiwinda Mbondenyi (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e713b4cb99343efc98d1f8 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19655257

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

Share

View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Sovereignty, Selective Justice, and the Limits of ICC Jurisdiction in the Duterte Case2026
2Sovereignty, Selective Justice, and the Limits of ICC Jurisdiction in the Duterte Case2026
3The Duterte Case and the Risk of Jurisdictional Overreach2026
4The Duterte Case and the Risk of Jurisdictional Overreach2026
5An Evaluation of the “Legacy Jurisdiction” of the International Criminal Court: The <i>Philippines</i> Investigation2025