• Highest sensory rating (T4) with pomegranate juice blend (60:40 ratio). • 19 aroma compounds in blended wine vs. 10 in control; phenyl ethyl alcohol dominates. • Anthocyanin content tripled to 494.20 mg/100 mL in blended wine (T4). • Antioxidant activity increased to 46.78% DPPH; total phenolics rose to 72.36 mg/100 g. This study investigates the physicochemical properties, sensory attributes, color characteristics, and bioactive constituents & aroma compounds of red dragon fruit wine blended with pomegranate juice. Sensory evaluation revealed that the blend prepared with the highest pomegranate juice content (T 4 ) was most preferred. The total soluble solids (TSS) ranged from 5.2 to 6.0 ° Brix, acidity from 0.60 to 0.66%, pH from 3.40 to 3.55, and alcohol content from 9.72 to 10.12% across the formulations. Color analysis showed that the L* value decreased, while the a* and b* values increased with increasing pomegranate juice concentration. The T 4 formulation showed the highest total phenolic content (72.357 mg/100 g), antioxidant activity (46.78% DPPH Inhibition), Anthocyanin content (494.20 mg/100 mL), Tannin content (65.89 mg/1000mL), FRAP activity (673.83 mM Fe 2 SO 4 Eq./100 mL) and Vitamin C (21.78 mg/100 g) whereas control wine had higher betacyanin content. GC- MS analysis identified 10 aromatic compounds in the control wine and 19 in T 4, with 1-butanol, 3-methyl (90.80%) and phenethyl alcohol (70.67 %) being the most abundant respectively. This result suggests that blending red dragon fruit wine with pomegranate juices enhances its sensory, color, bioactive and flavoring compounds, making it a promising functional alcoholic beverage.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shailesh Janardan Veer
P. P. Pawase
Sarang Aralkar
Food Chemistry Advances
Kyungpook National University
Chonnam National University
Lovely Professional University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Veer et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b71b85696592c86eb26c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2026.101300