Background: Critically ill cardiac patients who require invasive mechanical ventilation represent a high-risk population with persistently elevated in-hospital mortality, despite advances in cardiovascular and critical care management. Real-world data describing clinical profiles and prognostic patterns in this population remain limited. Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize clinical profiles and prognostic patterns among critically ill cardiac patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation and to identify variables associated with in-hospital mortality. Methods: We conducted a five-year retrospective observational cohort study, including 492 adult patients admitted to a tertiary cardiovascular intensive care unit who required invasive mechanical ventilation. The demographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, primary cardiac diagnoses, major in-hospital complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality were analyzed. Results: The overall in-hospital mortality was 53.9%. Acute myocardial infarction was the most frequent primary diagnosis. Advanced age, diabetes mellitus, cardiogenic shock, acute renal dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction and prolonged hospitalization were significantly associated with increased mortality (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Cardiogenic shock showed the strongest association (p < 0.001). Ventilator-associated respiratory infections occurred in 16.9% of patients, and were associated with a prolonged hospital stay (p < 0.05), without a statistically significant association with mortality. Conclusions: Critically ill cardiac patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation exhibit distinct high-risk clinical profiles characterized by advanced age, cardiogenic shock, metabolic comorbidities, and the development of multi-organ dysfunction. These findings highlight prognostic patterns that may support risk stratification and generate hypotheses for future prospective studies in cardiac intensive care.
Macovei et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: