The Hubble tension — the ~5σ disagreement between H₀ measured from the cosmic microwave background (Planck 2018: 67. 4 ± 0. 5 km/s/Mpc) and from local standard candles (SH0ES 2022: 73. 0 ± 1. 0 km/s/Mpc) — is one of the most significant unresolved problems in cosmology. Most proposed resolutions either modify early-universe physics (early dark energy, extra relativistic species) or modify the late-universe expansion (interacting dark energy, local voids), at the cost of introducing one or more free parameters. We present a resolution in the Three Time Dimensions (3+3) spacetime framework with zero adjustable parameters, in which the Hubble function is not constant but a geometric function of the cosmic angle θ: H (θ) = Hᵢnt × sin (2θ) with Hᵢnt = 78. 175 km/s/Mpc derived from S² compactification geometry (0. 014% from its self-consistent value) and θ the t₂ precession angle that advances from 0 at the Bang to π/2 at maximum expansion. This single formula replaces the ΛCDM Friedmann equation. At the CMB decoupling epoch θ ≈ 0. 04°, the observed H value corresponds to a different point on the sin (2θ) curve than at the current epoch θ = 55. 79° — so CMB and local measurements are measuring different things rather than contradicting each other. The prediction at the current epoch is: H₀ = Hᵢnt × sin (2θₙow) = 72. 7 km/s/Mpc The prediction falls between the Planck CMB value (67. 4, 7. 3% below) and the SH0ES local value (73. 0, 0. 4% below). The derivation of Hᵢnt uses the same geometric structure — a double projection at the magic angle θₙode = arccos (1/√3) = 54. 74°, yielding sin⁴ (θₙode) = 4/9 — that appears in the zero-parameter derivation of the fine-structure constant α = 1/137. 036 within the same framework. The fine-structure constant and the Hubble constant share one geometric origin. The framework makes a second, sharper prediction: the dark-energy equation of state w (θ) = −1 + (2/3) (θ̇/H (θ) ) cot (2θ) crosses w = −1 exactly at the geometric epoch θ = 45°, corresponding to redshift z = 0. 223. The prediction is that w (z) shows phantom behaviour (w −1) at z > 0. 22, with a sharp shape change around the crossing. This is not a CPL curve, and all six DESI 2024 BAO tracers currently agree with the prediction at <0. 2σ. DESI DR2 (expected 2026) will test the crossing directly at z ≈ 0. 2–0. 3.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
C. R. (René) de Haan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
C. R. (René) de Haan (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9baa885696592c86ecb8a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19666440