Psychotherapy is constrained by fundamental limits of human cognition: fatigue, attentional capacity, confirmation bias, and the impossibility of simultaneously tracking both immediate therapeutic process and longitudinal linguistic patterns. This paper proposes the Post-Session Linguistic Augmentation (PSLA) model, a theoretical framework for the use of large language models (LLMs) as post-session clinical augmentation tools that analyse therapy transcripts and return structured, probabilistic, hypothesis-level insights to the treating clinician. Critically, this framework positions LLMs not as diagnostic or therapeutic agents but as perceptual amplifiers operating within a human-in-the-loop architecture. Engaging with Haber et al.’s (2024) conceptualisation of the AI presence in therapy as an ‘artificial third,’ I argue that the risks of AI in psychotherapy are substantially architectural rather than inherent, and that a post-session, clinician-only configuration can access the perceptual advantages of LLM-based linguistic analysis while structurally preserving the therapeutic dyad. The paper details the functional architecture of a five-domain Clinical Augmentation Report, proposes a three-stage validation framework, presents an Uncertainty Management Architecture for handling hallucination and false positive risk, and outlines the ethical requirements governing consent, data sovereignty, and bias. Limitations, contraindications, and a proposed research agenda are discussed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David Sutton
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David Sutton (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9baeb85696592c86eccdf — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19676945
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: