What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to assess the accuracy and uniformity of the City of Johannesburg's 2018 property valuation estimates.

April 24, 2026Open Access

The evaluation of accuracy and uniformity in the mass valuation of properties in the city of Johannesburg, South Africa

Key Points

The aim is to assess the accuracy and uniformity of the City of Johannesburg's 2018 property valuation estimates.
Utilized a quantitative approach with descriptive and inferential statistics.
Applied Assessment Sales Ratio (ASR), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) on secondary property data.
Tested uniformity using Price Related Differential (PRD), Price Related Bias (PRB), and Coefficient of Dispersion (COD).
Measured Median ASR, MAPE, and RMSE were 0.90, 19.05%, and R123,514.66, respectively.
Uniformity measures revealed PRD at 1.02, PRB at -0.01, and COD at 18.87%.
Findings indicate an acceptable level of accuracy and uniformity, particularly for low-valued properties, highlighting the need for improved post-valuation analysis.

Abstract

Purpose The study arose because of myriad objections and consequent appeals to the tribunals regarding the municipal valuation estimates. This paper assesses valuation accuracy and uniformity levels relating to the City of Johannesburg's (CoJ's) general valuation roll (GVR) of 2018. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a quantitative approach underpinned by descriptive and inferential statistics. These statistical tools, including the Assessment Sales Ratio (ASR), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), were applied to a sample of secondary data on property assessments and sales obtained from the CoJ. The Price Related Differential (PRD), Price Related Bias (PRB), and Coefficient of Dispersion (COD) were used to test uniformity. Findings The results reveal the Median ASR, MAPE, and RMSE at 0.90, 19.05%, and R123,514.66, respectively. The uniformity measures for PRD, PRB, and COD are 1.02, −0.01, and 18.87%, respectively. In keeping with the IAAO standards, these results suggest an acceptable degree of accuracy and uniformity, which is fair to the rate payers of the low-valued properties. The results also underscore the critical need for the post-valuation date ratio analysis in South African municipalities, a step that cannot be delayed. Research limitations/implications The study relates to the compelling need for post-valuation independent ratio studies conducted on the GVRs, with specific consideration given to the assessed values. After the valuation date, the property sales were not sufficiently large for the sample; hence, remedial measures were taken to improve the sample's representativeness. Originality/value This is the first time a post-valuation date study on accuracy and uniformity of value estimates has been done in South Africa, thus proving an independent audit on the GVRs. Extending such practice to all local property rates and taxes municipalities in South Africa is imperative, as it would enhance public confidence in municipal valuation.

Read Full Paperexternally

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper