This article features the Groton School cuneiform-text collection, including a discussion on its provenance as well as photographs, transliterations, translations, notes, and commentaries on the three texts in the collection. Two of the texts are from the Ur III period (ca. 2110–2003 B.C.E.), whereas one is from the Late Babylonian period (ca. 5th century B.C.E. through 1st century C.E.). The Ur III texts are an expense report from Puzriš-Dagān and a sealed receipt from an unknown provenience. Their commentaries focus on key terminology such as the term šu-gid2 in the former and the phrase apin-la2-ta ba-a in the latter. The Late Babylonian text is a loan document from Sippar concerning silver for a house sale. It is utilized for a detailed reconstruction of the provenance of the Maštuk archive, first postulated by Caroline Waerzeggers (2002). The commentaries for all three texts also highlight prosopographical observations, especially for the Late Babylonian text.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Andrew Pottorf
Andrew AN Deloucas
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pottorf et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0b25553a5433e34b5008 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.127650
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: