IE qw - : Italic v - For examples cf. Walde, Et. Wb. under invītus, vapidus, vapor, and Brugmann, Gr. I 2 321. As noted above, this change is not Latin nor even Italic, but pre-Italic. For if IE qw - had come down into Italic as kw-, it would have fallen together with q w -. If Persson, Beitr. 520 ff., is correct in regard to the primary meaning of invītāre, this must be dropped from the list. But perhaps two different words are represented in invītāre : one connected as given by Persson 1.c., and the other related to Lith. kv sti, as usually given.
A Wed, study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: