This study investigates whether AI-powered predictive analytics can support exploratory delivery disruption detection, operationalizing supply chain resilience as an observable delivery performance outcome rather than a latent organizational capability. Random Forest and XGBoost classification models were developed and evaluated using a publicly available secondary logistics dataset hosted on Kaggle (N = 12,144), whose original organizational provenance and collection procedures could not be independently verified. Accordingly, findings are interpreted as exploratory and dataset-specific. Random Forest achieved 63.5% accuracy and XGBoost 62.0% on the held-out test set, compared with a 57.9% majority-class baseline, indicating modest predictive improvement over trivial classification. Both models performed substantially better on delayed deliveries than on on-time deliveries, suggesting limited three-class discriminative capability. Because delivery duration was derived from the same temporal fields underlying the outcome label, its predictive role is interpreted cautiously due to potential target-adjacent information. Regional comparisons are therefore presented descriptively through separate delivery indicators rather than a weighted composite resilience score. The study contributes a cautious predictive benchmark for exploratory delay-risk screening and identifies methodological priorities for future work using validated logistics datasets and leakage-resistant feature designs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Md Raisul Islam Khan
Discover Analytics
California State Polytechnic University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Md Raisul Islam Khan (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69edab814a46254e215b369f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44257-026-00065-6
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: