Abstract This study presents a systematic analysis of ceramic art’s mediating role in Sino-European cultural exchanges, proposing a tripartite framework examining morphological divergence, chromatic symbolism, and decorative semiotics. Through archival research, museum collection analysis, and contemporary practice documentation, this investigation reveals how ceramic technologies and aesthetic philosophies have undergone dialectical transformation through intercultural contact. The research establishes three distinct phases of exchange: pre-modern trade-driven adaptation (7th–15th centuries), colonial-era technological transfer (16th–18th centuries), and contemporary globalized hybridization (19th–21st centuries). Particular emphasis is placed on technical knowledge transmission, contemporary artistic innovations, and the paradoxical relationship between cultural preservation and aesthetic convergence. The findings demonstrate that ceramic exchange has functioned as both a vehicle for cultural diplomacy and a catalyst for artistic innovation, generating hybrid aesthetic vocabularies that transcend traditional East-West binaries.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yibo He
Lan Yao
Yuanyuan Tian
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Shanghai University
Central China Normal University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
He et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69edabb84a46254e215b3a6b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07023-3