Abstract Remote target classification in fisheries acoustics surveys requires knowledge about the frequency response and/or target strength (TS) of key targets, features that are known to vary with species and region. In Baltic Sea hydro-acoustic surveys, no frequency response information has been available, and a single TS–Length relationship, derived from North Sea herring, is currently applied to the three main pelagic species: herring (Clupea harengus), sprat (Sprattus sprattus), and three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Here, we combine morphometric measurements, fish shape modeling and Kirchoff Ray Mode estimations to derive refined, species-specific TS–Length relationships for the three species. Our new estimates for 38 kHz are the following: TSC harengus = 21.92 log10(L)–66.55, TSS sprattus = 26.47 log10(L) -72.60, TSG aculeatus = 40.93 log10(L)–84.13. These estimates were validated using in situ TS data obtained during 61 single species trawl hauls (2019–2024). Species-specific TS–Length relationships significantly reduced estimation errors compared to the generic TS–Length relationship currently used, which was found to overestimate abundance by an average of 263%. Further, the new TS–Length relationships enabled the correct remote classification of the dominant species in 85% of validation hauls based on their observed TS distributions. These findings demonstrate that adopting species-specific TS models is essential for providing unbiased abundance measurements and facilitating the transition toward nonlethal ecosystem monitoring using acoustics.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jonas Hentati-Sundberg
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Sven Gastauer
Hochschule Bremerhaven
Astrid A. Carlsen
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
ICES Journal of Marine Science
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Hochschule Bremerhaven
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hentati-Sundberg et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd15fede9185760d3e33 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsag053
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: