What question did this study set out to answer?

This analysis aims to critically evaluate Zhai Xingyun's PAPER-Δ in relation to the Theory of Objectivity and its ontological implications.

April 27, 2026Open Access

THE STRUCTURAL ARCHITECTURE OF PHYSICAL REALITY IN CONFRONTATION WITH THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Zhai Xingyun's PAPER-∆, the structural ontology of the DCQ–FBT framework, and its limits before modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, cosmological Eras, and the substance transcendent to the quantum in TO

Key Points

This analysis aims to critically evaluate Zhai Xingyun's PAPER-Δ in relation to the Theory of Objectivity and its ontological implications.
Critical–propositional analysis of the DCQ–FBT framework and its constitutional postulates.
Comparison of the framework's structural elements with the modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity.
Identification of tensions and gaps in both theoretical approaches.
PAPER-Δ presents a robust structural framework compatible with the Theory of Objectivity's rejection of object-based ontology.
Critical tensions are noted, including the lack of a formulated ontology of Nothingness and the omission of relational observation.
The analysis proposes a new interpretation of the DCQ–FBT framework situated between logical structures and phenomenic emergence.

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Zhai Xingyun’s PAPER-Δ: The Structural Architecture of Physical Reality — A Minimal Ontological Constitution for the DCQ–FBT Framework in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study examines the four constitutional postulates of the DCQ–FBT framework — Structural Realism, Symplectic Admissibility, Modal Determinism, and Topological Locking — and compares them with the modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity, especially the Seven Absolute Truths, the phenomenic elements, the Inductive Effects, the cosmogonic theorem of TO, and the cosmological Eras of the theory. The analysis argues that PAPER-Δ offers a powerful formal architecture of structural admissibility, in which spacetime, observables, dynamical histories, discrete sectors, and stable physical constants are interpreted as constrained readouts of a deeper geometric and algebraic substrate. From the perspective of TO, this architecture is compatible with the rejection of primitive object-based ontology, the primacy of structural admissibility, the role of modal selection, and the stabilization of physical sectors through topological constraints. However, the article also identifies important points of tension. PAPER-Δ does not formulate an ontology of Nothingness, does not fully develop observation as a relational condition involving at least two other elements, does not explicitly theorize the aura as a modal principle of individuation, and does not incorporate the substance transcendent to the quantum as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The article proposes that the DCQ–FBT framework may be interpreted, in light of the Theory of Objectivity, as a formal architecture located between the Logical Tracks and the phenomenic emergence of spacetime. Its contribution lies in offering a constitutional theory of physical structure, while the Theory of Objectivity offers a deeper modal ontology of genesis, boundary, observation, composition, and informational transcendence. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; DCQ–FBT Framework; PAPER-Δ; Zhai Xingyun; Structural Realism; Symplectic Admissibility; Modal Determinism; Topological Locking; Ontological Architecture; Modal Ontology; Phenomenic Elements; Inductive Effects; Cosmology; Emergent Spacetime; Topological Invariants; Information; Atomic Radiation; Transcendent Substance; Critical–Propositional Analysis.

Read Full Paperexternally

Mark Helpful

Bookmark

Relay

View Full Paper