PurposeThis study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with or without induction chemoimmunotherapy (CI) in unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Materials and MethodsThe study included patients with unresectable ESCC who received CCRT with or without induction CI at three cancer centers.Patients receiving concurrent immunotherapy were excluded.Propensity score matching (PSM) balanced baseline characteristics between groups. ResultsA total of 519 patients were included.After PSM, 183 patients per group were selected.Induction CI significantly improved OS and PFS compared to CCRT alone, consistently.The median OS for CCRT and induction CI groups were 29.9 months (95% CI: 18.8-41.0)and not reached (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.77,p < 0.001).The median PFS was 17.6 months (IQR: 13.7-21.4)versus 30.6 months (IQR: 17.3-43.8)(HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51-0.86,p = 0.002).Responders to the induction CI had significantly better OS (HR: 0.22, 95%CI: 0.14-0.36,p < 0.001) than nonresponders.Subgroup analysis showed radiation dose escalation or consolidation immunotherapy did not further improve survival in the induction CI group. ConclusionThe addition of induction chemoimmunotherapy to CCRT was associated with improved survival in patients with locally advanced unresectable ESCC, particularly in responders to induction chemoimmunotherapy, with acceptable toxicity.These findings warrant confirmation in prospective randomized trials.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Biqi Chen
Peiying Cen
Qi Cheng
Cancer Research and Treatment
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Sun Yat-sen University
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f0e31e5f7920c6386d74 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.1224
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: