Background-Augmented Reality (AR) has emerged as a prominent technology in science education; however, a comprehensive understanding of its research trends and empirical applications remains limited. Objectives-This study aims to map the research landscape and synthesize empirical evidence on the integration of AR in science education by combining bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review. Method-A bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in the Scopus database from 2016 to 2025 was conducted using keyword-based search and screening procedures based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify relevant studies. Additionally, a systematic review of 32 selected empirical studies was conducted to examine learning outcomes, scientific content, and methodological characteristics. Results-The findings reveal a significant increase in AR-related publications, particularly after 2020, with research focusing on conceptual understanding, motivation, and engagement across educational levels. Physics and general science dominate the subject areas, while quasi-experimental and mixed-methods designs are most commonly employed. Despite its positive impact on cognitive and affective learning outcomes, gaps remain in interdisciplinary content, teacher-focused research, and methodological diversity. Conclusions-This study highlights the growing maturity of AR research in science education while emphasizing the need for broader research scope and more diverse approaches to support future pedagogical innovation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ahmad Saputra
Yogyakarta State University
Insih Wilujeng
Yogyakarta State University
Antuni Wiyarsi
Yogyakarta State University
Research and Development in Education (RaDEn)
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Auckland
Yogyakarta State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Saputra et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69f44223967e944ac5565eb7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v6i1.43412
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: