Generative AI is increasingly embedded in China's short-video production, yet on authenticity-oriented platforms its visible use can be discrediting. Drawing on 16 in-depth interviews with creators active on Xiaohongshu and Douyin, this article introduces AI passing: creators' strategic efforts to conceal and humanize AI-assisted drafts so that outputs plausibly appear human-authored. We show that creators associate legible AI assistance with intertwined trust vulnerabilities, including epistemic unreliability, anticipated relational penalties, and platform authenticity regimes. To manage this legibility, creators perform four recurring forms of invisible authenticity labor: epistemic verification, linguistic naturalization, narrative restructuring, and performative embodiment. These practices reallocate work from generation to downstream repair and performance, complicating claims that AI simply improves efficiency. Finally, we demonstrate that passing capacity is stratified by educational and professional capital, economic resources and team support, and platform position, producing trust-based inequality in who can leverage AI while sustaining credibility, voice, and liveness.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xiaolong Su
Tingli Liu
Zhuo Ye
Frontiers in Psychology
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Communication University of China
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Su et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5939871405d493affea18 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1800866