Zero poses a unique challenge for numerical cognition because it denotes absence in cardinal contexts, yet functions as a formal entity in ordinal or interval systems. We examined how adults compare zero to positive single-digit numbers across symbolic, nonsymbolic, and mixed formats. Results replicated classic distance and end effects for positive numbers. However, the cognitive status of zero was found to be strictly format-dependent. In the symbolic format, the distance effect was driven by boundary values (0 and 1) and vanished when they were removed, suggesting symbolic zero functions as a structural anchor that defines the semantic transition from absence to quantity. In contrast, nonsymbolic zero was integrated into a continuous, nonlinear magnitude gradient, following the same psychophysical power-function pattern as other quantities. Furthermore, the 0, 1 pair elicited a unique facilitation in nonsymbolic and mixed formats, but not in the symbolic format. Together, these findings suggest that zero is not merely a point on a scale but a multi-faceted construct: while nonsymbolic zero is processed as a perceptual category of absence, symbolic zero acts as a semantic boundary that redefines the internal structure of the mental number line.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tali Leibovich
Christine Mireb-Geraisy
Psychological Research
University of Haifa
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Leibovich et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4da8c0f03fd67763ebc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-026-02301-w