E031 Inspiring research in rheumatology physiotherapists: survey results from the Rheumatology Physiotherapy UK Professional Network

Abstract Background/Aims The Rheumatology Physiotherapy UK Professional Network (PN) promotes best practice. Physiotherapists play a pivotal role in rheumatology care, yet their engagement in research remains variable. We aimed to understand members’ current research activity and needs to inform future PN research educational strategies. Methods A self-completed Microsoft online survey questionnaire was designed to clarify physiotherapists’ research involvement, experience and associated support needs. Thirty questions evaluated respondent demographics, research activity, barriers and enablers to research involvement, interest and confidence in undertaking research. Respondents suggested ways in which the PN could support them to participate more in research. Dissemination was via the members’ monthly bulletin, WhatsApp group, and professional networks in summer 2025. Results Thirty-four responses were received: 24 (70.6%) respondents worked in NHS physiotherapy, four (11.8%) in private practice, and seven (20%) in both NHS and private practice. Physiotherapists were highly experienced; 23 (67%) reported more than 21 years of qualified experience. One respondent (3%) had less than 5 years’ experience. Twenty-nine (85%) respondents were employed at Band 7 equivalent or above. Ten (26%) had a master’s level or above qualification. Eleven (32%) reported research included in their job description. Eighteen (53%) stated research was not part of their role, 27 respondents (79%) undertook a service evaluation in the previous year, and 25 (74%) reported routinely collecting data. Predominant barriers to research engagement were insufficient time and support. The main enablers to undertaking research expressed were enthusiasm, protected time, managerial and peer support. Physiotherapists’ self-reported interest in doing research was 3.75/5, although confidence in undertaking research activities was 2.82/5. Signposting to new research resources, offering webinars, and providing links to existing research teams were ranked most important supportive PN strategies for members. Physiotherapists often reported that research was not part of their role, despite the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy’s longstanding statement that research is one of the four pillars of physiotherapy practice, and research is embedded within the Rheumatology Physiotherapy Capabilities Framework. There is a professional expectation to participate in research activity to improve healthcare delivery. Research was not defined in the questionnaire, and it is evident that perceptions about research and actual involvement vary. Despite being a graduate profession, research continues to be a less prioritised pillar of practice. Service evaluations and audits are commonplace, but this rarely translates into research. The PN have an opportunity to involve students and newly qualified physiotherapists who have research knowledge and skills to inspire future rheumatology research capacity. Conclusion Despite lack of time and support, rheumatology physiotherapists are interested in research but lack confidence. The Rheumatology Physiotherapy UK PN has an opportunity to both improve confidence and educate members. Enhanced networking, signposting to existing resources, dedicated educational webinars and group projects are therefore planned to inspire and demystify involvement in research. Disclosure C.A. Wilson: None. H. Chambers: None. W.J. Gregory: None. R. Hayward: None. C. McCrum: None. N. Scrafton: None. A.V. O’Brien: None.