The rapid shift towards remote and digital workspaces, accelerated by global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, has redefined traditional notions of the workplace. While remote work offers flexibility and increased productivity, it has also given rise to new forms of workplace harassment that existing legal frameworks are ill-equipped to handle. In virtual environments, harassment can occur through emails, video calls, messaging platforms, and social media, blurring the lines between professional and personal boundaries. This paper critically examines the evolving nature of workplace harassment in digital and remote settings. It examines the inadequacy of current laws, which were primarily designed for physical workplaces, and analyses how these frameworks fail to account for the nuances of virtual misconduct. Through an evaluation of domestic laws, comparative legal analysis of international frameworks, and real-world case studies, the paper identifies significant legal and procedural gaps. Issues such as unclear definitions of
Rama Dutt (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: