Analysis of 25.3 years of global GNSS timing data (165.2 million station pairs) documents persistent velocity-dependent correlations in atomic clock networks. Critically, we propose that standard GNSS processing algorithms, designed to remove energetic (common-mode) errors via datum constraints, inadvertently preserve the subtle, geometry-dependent (differential) correlations that are the focus of this work. Building on the multi-centre study's validation (R²=0.92-0.97 between CODE, IGS, ESA), the extended temporal baseline confirms decadal stability and enables investigation of long-period geophysical phenomena inaccessible in shorter baselines. Seven independent signatures are identified: (1) Spatial anisotropy persists with EW>NS (global ratio=2.16, strength=1.981, p 30), velocity-dependent anisotropy (r=-0.888), and geometric alignment (EW/NS=2.16). The absence of GM/r² scaling is physically consistent with the hypothesis that energetic couplings are filtered by processing while geometric information is transmitted; raw carrier-phase analysis will test this transmission mechanism. Raw data validation and multi-constellation replication represent critical next steps. Website: https://mlsmawfield.com/tep/gnss-ii/Code Availability: https://github.com/matthewsmawfield/TEP-GNSS-II DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17517141 Keywords: temporal equivalence principle – GNSS – atomic clocks – 25-year analysis – spatial correlations – modified gravity – Temporal Topology Open Science Statement: This work is a preprint and is open to community review, ideas, and collaboration. All materials required for full reproducibility—including data downloads, analysis scripts, code, and manuscripts—are open-source. Feedback and contributions to further test these results are welcome.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matthew Lukin Smawfield
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matthew Lukin Smawfield (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f442d4967e944ac55663fb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19886253
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: