Abstract: Migrant laborers in the sense of moving between states within India or going outside the country in the dusty Bihar villages to the shiny construction projects in the Gulf, represent both the hope and the danger of human mobility. Their work drives economies, remits money to families that keeps a whole family alive, but they are still one of the most overlooked and exploited groups in the world. This essay presents a critical human-centred examination of the legal structures that are created to protect their frights on the international and national level, and reveal the deep gaps in the implementation. The core of the international regime is the 1990 International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (ICMW), which is supplemented by ILO Conventions 97 and 143, and the Global Compact for Migration of 2018. These tools offer non-discrimination, good salaries, safe working environments, and access to justice- rights based on the universal dignity established by the UDHR and the two Covenants. In India, there is a domestic shield in the form of the constitutional provisions of Articles 14, 21, 23 and the former Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act 1979 and its inclusion in the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code 2020. However, as the 2020 pandemic and recent Gulf crises have shown in a tragically demonstrative way, these promises are often translated into bureaucratic silence and the watering down of policies. This analysis, particularly of the lived experiences of workers in Bihar, one of the largest migrant-sending states in India, reveals systemic failures: the lack of ratification of core treaties, weak enforcement mechanisms, exclusion of the informal sector, and the asymmetry between sending and receiving countries. Weaving both legal commentary and the human experiences of dignity denied and resilience put, the paper makes the argument that it is not only a policy imperative to bridge these gaps, but also a moral obligation to treat migrant workers as rights-bearing persons, rather than disposable commodities. Migration can be turned into a dignified journey instead of a desperate one only with the help of ratifications, strong digital governance, and true interstate collaboration.
Ankita Toppo Gaps Paul Pankaj Kujur (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: