Abstract We establish the foundations of UD theory and derive general relativity as its macroscopic limit. The universe originates from a critical state of dynamic equilibrium (U=D), where two fundamental attributes continuously compete. After symmetry breaking, four aspects emerge as physical fields. Two sequential normalization conditions govern the pre-breakdown (linear sum) and post-breakdown (quadratic integral) phases. The structural constant e^ is obtained through physical image identification at extreme limits: characterizes the balance of radial condensation and isotropic resistance at the black hole limit; e^ characterizes self-driven expansion at the vacuum limit, with e identified as the natural base of U's intrinsic dynamics. Macroscopic background values UU=UD=1/4, DD=DU=1/ (4e^) follow from critical state inheritance and the vacuum rejection mechanism. Four exhaustive mathematical projections emerge: scalar (gravity), spinor (quantum mechanics), vector (electromagnetism), and tensor (spacetime geometry). The tensor projection constructs g_ from the energy-momentum tensor of the four-aspect fields. The scalar projection yields a scalar-tensor theory; when freezes via the intrinsic chameleon mechanism at ₀=8/17, the theory reduces to general relativity. The post-Newtonian parameter -1-6. 510^-6 is consistent with Cassini constraints. All derivations are self-contained. Key Points - UD theory employs **physical image identification** at extreme limits—a legitimate a priori paradigm analogous to Einstein's equivalence principle being identified prior to field equations- Structural constant e^ encodes the inseparability of black hole and vacuum limits under exact U D duality- General relativity emerges as the frozen-scalar limit with intrinsic chameleon screening- -1 is structurally determined and robust across orders of magnitude- UD theory is a metatheory: it reveals GR's origin without replacing it References Will (2014), Living Rev. Rel. 17, 4; Bertotti et al. (2003), Nature 425, 374; Planck Collaboration (2020), A Abbott et al. (2016), PRL 116, 061102; Brans Khoury Damour & Esposito-Farese (1992), CQG 9, 2093.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dan Zhu
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dan Zhu (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f593f271405d493affed99 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19903855