This paper proposes that perceived randomness in complex systems is not ontological indeterminacy, but an epistemic projection of trajectory multiplicity () in non-Lipschitz regimes. We demonstrate that when uniqueness conditions fail, the observer's inability to resolve multiple admissible solutions induces a perception of stochasticity. Utilizing the Theorem of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA) framework, we formalize this phenomenon through the interaction of internal dynamics (N₀), admissibility boundaries (_), and irreducible selectors (N₁). The analysis extends the TNA model to Fokker-Planck probability flows and quantum wavefunction collapse, arguing that "collapse" is the structural requirement for uniqueness in systems that cannot close themselves. This interpretation provides a unified lens for understanding indeterminacy in generative AI, dynamical systems, and quantum measurement.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Claudio Bresciano
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Claudio Bresciano (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5952971405d493a00016c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19925656