Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as both a technical apparatus and a cultural signifier that reorganizes how subjectivity, desire, and knowledge are conceived. AI tends to translate uncertainty into probabilistic completion, turning the question into calculable demand; psychoanalysis, by contrast, insists on the constitutive incompleteness of thought. Human intelligence, structured by the unconscious, is marked by failure, displacement, and invention. This article distinguishes the artificial machine, which promises exhaustive answers, from the analyst as artefact, who sustains lack and the openness of the question. In doing so, psychoanalysis offers a necessary counterpoint to AI, preserving desire as the ground of subjectivity.
Chiara Rossi (Tue,) studied this question.