This record contains the DFG Empirical Compatibility Atlas v1.3, the final programme-state document for the Deficit-Fractal Governance (DFG) Empirical Programme as of May 2026. The Atlas consolidates the post-search-sprint results of the DFG empirical programme and defines the programme’s current operating methodology: a regime-atlas framework rather than a theory-cemetery framework. Across eight targeted regime-search experiments (Exp 12–19), four initially quarantined theory families found at least one located, compatible-in-regime operationalisation: Cascade Universality, Topology-Level Containment, Intervention Paradox, and AGC reformulation. The central methodological principle is that cell-level incompatibility should not be interpreted as immediate theory-level falsification. Instead, failed cells are treated as regime-boundary markers that motivate targeted search across operationalisation, substrate, observable, and scale. The Atlas distinguishes between:- globally quarantined universal claims,- compatible-in-regime operationalisations,- data-gated unsearched cells,- operationalisation-limited cells, and- located regimes with multi-evidence support. Key consolidated results include:- Cascade Universality located in a Manna conservative cascade + Watts-Strogatz small-world + low-dissipation regime, finite-size robust across N = 1000–5000.- Topology-Level Containment reframed as objective-dependent connectivity prediction, where graph Laplacian λ₂ predicts connectivity strength rather than generic resilience.- Intervention Paradox located in nonlinear bistable, saturation, delayed-control, and resource-depleting regimes.- H4-β financial critical slowing down supported under substrate-matched observables.- H5-γ dynamical-Jacobian spectral-radius recovery supported across synthetic and real meso-neural tests.- H1 neural operating-point criticality supported as σ ≈ 1, while the universal τ ≈ 3/2 claim remains quarantined except for located synthetic regimes. This record is part of the DFG Empirical Programme submission package. It should be read before the associated Paper A and Paper B documents, because it defines the status taxonomy and interpretation rules used throughout the package.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bin Seol
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bin Seol (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e5ac8071d4f1bdfc65d7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19241793