This paper investigates patterns of finite interrogative clauses in the context of s(emantic)-selection, with the empirical focus on Korean and Japanese. While s-selection of interrogatives is satisfied non-locally in these languages, it is blocked across the DP domain in nominalized contexts. Further, the languages must opt for an interrogative variant of nominalizer to locally satisfy s-selection. In order to account for these patterns, I propose that s-selection of interrogatives involves a type of syntactic dependencies, which is subject to phase-based locality and involves the valuation of a selection feature. This claim, in a broader context, suggests that certain types of s-selection may as well be motivated as a syntactic requirement rather than a lexical constraint.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yeongmin Kim
Cornell University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yeongmin Kim (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e67c8071d4f1bdfc729e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.11576/glow-1258
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: