Background and Objective: The clinical success of novel antibody-drug conjugates has led to the identification of a new subgroup within traditionally HER2-negative breast cancers, termed ‘HER2-low.’ The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological differences between HER2-low and HER2-negative groups in neoadjuvant-naive primary breast cancer patients, with a specific focus on stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (sTIL) density. Materials and Methods: The study included 731 neoadjuvant-naive invasive breast cancer patients. Tumors were classified as HER2-negative (IHC 0) and HER2-low (IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-negative). sTIL levels were evaluated following the International TILs Working Group guidelines. Results: The HER2-low group (38.7%) demonstrated significantly higher histological grade (p = 0.033) and higher sTIL density (p = 0.006) compared to the HER2-negative group. A stepwise increase in sTIL rates was observed parallel to the HER2 immunohistochemical score (0 → 1+ → 2+) (p = 0.015). The HER2-low/hormone receptor (HR)-negative subgroup exhibited the highest sTIL density (median 35%). No statistically significant difference in overall or disease-free survival was found between the groups. Conclusions: HER2-low breast cancers were associated with a more immunogenic tumor microenvironment compared to HER2-negative tumors. This robust immune infiltration may offset the higher histological grade observed in the HER2-low cohort, potentially explaining the comparable survival outcomes. These findings provide a biological rationale for exploring the synergy between novel antibody–drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly in the highly immunogenic HER2-low/HR-negative subgroup.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
M Emiroglu
Esra Canan Kelten Talu
Cem Karaalı
Medicina
Izmir University
Sivas State Hospital
Izmir Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Emiroglu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f837933ed186a739981c68 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050826