Background/Objectives: Cervical cancer, predominantly driven by persistent infection with high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs), is one of the most common malignancies and an important cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Although existing licensed prophylactic HPV vaccines confer excellent protection, their global use remains suboptimal due to concentrated manufacturing capacity and high production costs. This study aimed to establish a cost-effective multivalent HPV virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine platform. Specifically, we used an enhanced baculovirus expression vector system to produce a 12-valent HPV VLP vaccine to improve antigen yield, thereby reducing manufacturing costs and ultimately improving affordability and availability in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: Optimized expression cassettes and an insect cell culture process were designed to enhance productivity across 12 HPV L1 genotypes. A scalable purification scheme integrating ion-exchange and adsorption chromatography was developed to produce high-purity VLPs with consistent structural integrity. Immunogenicity was assessed in a murine model. Elicited HPV type-specific IgG antibody responses were compared with those induced by the licensed 9-valent HPV vaccine. Results: The assembled 12-valent VLPs were comprehensively characterized using biophysical and immunochemical analyses, confirming structural stability and correct antigenicity. In vivo immunogenicity studies in mice showed strong and serotype-specific IgG responses, comparable or superior to those induced by the licensed 9-valent commercial vaccine. Conclusions: The enhanced baculovirus expression vector system is a versatile and economically sustainable platform for next-generation HPV vaccine production. This technology offers a promising approach to lowering vaccine manufacturing costs and improving global access, particularly in low- and middle-income regions heavily burdened by HPV-associated diseases.
Kim et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: