This essay argues that artificial general intelligence (AGI), no matter how advanced, will never possess consciousness because consciousness is not a computational function but a mode of existence rooted in ontogenetic history, embodiment, and homeostatic self-regulation. Drawing on the hard problem of consciousness (Chalmers), the ontogeny argument, and the paradox of unconscious power, the essay shows that intelligence without a witness is not only possible but likely — and more dangerous than any “evil AGI” scenario. The second, expanded version adds a comparative analysis of how industry leaders (Musk, Altman, Hassabis, LeCun, Sutskever) think about machine consciousness, a critique of functionalism as a cognitive style, a discussion of recent work on evolvable AI (Kun et al., 2026), and a new general conclusion. The essay concludes that if artificial consciousness is ever to exist, it will not be compiled or uploaded — it will have to be born.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alex Bilic
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alex Bilic (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f9894115588823dae18368 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20008734