What type of study is this?

This is a Meta-Analysis study (also classified as: Systematic Review).

May 6, 2026Open Access

Effects of Various Exercise Interventions on Sprint Performance and Jump Height in Soccer Players: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Key Points

To evaluate the effects of various exercise interventions on sprint performance and jump height in soccer players.
Conducted systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Included 31 studies comparing six types of exercise interventions
Utilized frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis to analyze outcomes.
Traditional Strength Training most effective for 5-m and 20-m sprint performance and squat jump height
Speed Training ranked highest for 30-m sprint, though not statistically significant compared with Regular Training
Short-sprint acceleration and jump performance benefits were mainly consistent with strength-oriented training.

Abstract

To evaluate and compare the effects of six exercise interventions on sprint performance and vertical jump height in soccer players using a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2000 to 30 September 2025. Thirty-one eligible studies were included, covering Traditional Strength Training, Plyometric Jump Training, Speed Training, Endurance Training, Flexibility Training, and Regular Training. A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted. Outcomes were pre-specified hierarchically, with sprint performance and vertical jump height as co-primary outcomes and COD and 1RM as secondary outcomes; secondary outcomes were interpreted as supportive rather than primary evidence. Traditional Strength Training was most effective for 5-m sprint performance (SUCRA = 99.8%; MD = -0.09 s, 95% CI: -0.11 to -0.07), 20-m sprint performance (SUCRA = 89.9%; MD = -0.13 s, 95% CI: -0.20 to -0.06), and squat jump height (SUCRA = 86.2%; MD = 4.40 cm, 95% CI: 2.07 to 6.74). For the 30-m sprint, Speed Training ranked highest by SUCRA (74.2%), but the comparison with Regular Training was not statistically significant (MD = -0.16 s, 95% CI: -0.34 to 0.01). For the 40-m sprint, no intervention showed a statistically significant advantage over Regular Training. Among the pre-specified co-primary outcomes, Traditional Strength Training appears to provide the most consistent benefits for short-sprint acceleration (5-20 m) and vertical jump performance in soccer players. Evidence for 30-40 m sprint performance was uncertain, and secondary outcomes (COD and 1RM) should be interpreted as supportive rather than as the primary basis for overall effectiveness claims. These findings support prioritizing strength-oriented training when short-sprint acceleration and vertical jump performance are key goals; however, the implications should be interpreted cautiously because certainty varied across comparisons and residual uncertainty remains. The protocol for this systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024608868).

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper