Abstract Chemical corrosion is a critical factor driving the degradation of rock engineering properties, particularly in carbonate-rich formations. To investigate the mechanisms of limestone deterioration under extreme chemical conditions, this study conducted continuous immersion tests in acidic (pH = 2, H₂SO₄) and alkaline (pH = 12, NaOH) solutions, together with wet–dry cycling and acid–alkali alternation experiments. A control group without chemical treatment was also included for comparison. The macroscopic and microscopic responses of limestone were systematically analyzed through porosity, mass loss, P-wave velocity, uniaxial compressive strength, and microstructural characterization. Results revealed that degradation severity followed the order: acid–alkali alternation > acidic wet–dry cycling > continuous acid immersion > alkaline ≈ control. After 30 days, the acid–alkali alternation group exhibited the most severe deterioration, with porosity increasing from 0.29% to 0.42%, mass loss reaching 0.92%, P-wave velocity decreasing from 5796 m/s (10 days) to 5268 m/s (30 days), and UCS declining from 43.83 MPa (10 days) to 33.73 MPa (30 days). At the microscale, acidic conditions promoted CaCO 3 dissolution with CaSO₄ precipitation (up to 11.6% during wet–dry cycles), enlarging pores and pore throats, while acid–alkali alternation triggered cyclic precipitation–dissolution stresses that produced interconnected microcrack networks. In contrast, alkaline conditions showed only weak passivation and precipitation. A strength prediction model was established based on the chemical damage variable D defined by P-wave velocity, which exhibited a strong power-law relationship with strength (R 2 ≈ 0.93). This study explains three coupled mechanisms—dissolution-dominated, dissolution–crystallization synergy, and chemical fatigue—and proposes a simple, economical, and non-destructive velocity–strength framework for rapid durability assessment and early warning in acid rain, industrial effluent, and underground engineering contexts.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Han Zihao
Meldi Suhatril
Huzaifa Hashim
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zihao et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa986a04f884e66b5322bc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-026-04989-x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: