Purpose Libraries have historically been defined by their physical architecture and passive role as repositories of knowledge. In the artificial intelligence (AI) era, however, they are undergoing a “Digital Renaissance,” evolving into proactive, intelligent partners in knowledge creation. The digital renaissance is examined, where AI redefines discovery, accessibility and the librarian’s role as a steward of truth. It examines the algorithmic shift from traditional search to semantic discovery. Methodology Using literature review over the last three years, this paper examines the technological transformation of libraries, including the shift from keyword-based search to semantic discovery powered by large language models. It highlights front-end innovations such as AI chatbots, generative tools and personalized recommendations, alongside backend systems like automated metadata generation, predictive logistics and RFID-enabled efficiency. Findings While AI integration enhances operational efficiency and user engagement, it also introduces ethical challenges. Key concerns include privacy risks from data harvesting, algorithmic bias that may marginalize voices and generative AI “hallucinations” that undermine the authority of verified information. Conclusion Far from rendering libraries obsolete, AI elevates their relevance. By automating routine tasks, libraries position librarians as leaders in AI literacy, focusing on fostering critical thinking, ensuring algorithmic transparency, guiding communities in digital ethics and safeguarding the integrity of human knowledge.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Adetoun A. Oyelude
Library Hi Tech News
Olusegun Agagu University of Science and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Adetoun A. Oyelude (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa28f04f884e66b533314 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-03-2026-0064
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: